[PATCH] D115040: [gn build] Build with Fission on non-mac non-win when using lld
Nico Weber via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Dec 3 07:14:18 PST 2021
thakis added a comment.
Full numbers:
is_debug = true
$ ministat dbg_before.txt dbg_after.txt
x dbg_before.txt
+ dbg_after.txt
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|+ + + + + x xx x x|
| |________________M_A__________________| |_______M_________A________________| |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 5 5.2263865 5.7603414 5.2823768 5.4064289 0.22182468
+ 5 4.2161133 4.8450658 4.4456208 4.4625463 0.23867625
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-0.943883 +/- 0.336032
-17.4585% +/- 6.21541%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.230405)
release/sym
thakis at thakis:~/src/llvm-project/out/gn$ ministat rel_before.txt rel_after.txt
x rel_before.txt
+ rel_after.txt
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|+ + + + + xx x x x|
| |____A____| |_____MA_____| |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 5 2.204227 2.335144 2.2594814 2.2635095 0.057581912
+ 5 1.2554414 1.3601334 1.3091564 1.3093105 0.042406506
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-0.954199 +/- 0.0737487
-42.1557% +/- 3.25816%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.0505667)
For fun, I also tried with gold ld and bfd ld, but only in a release+sym build since it was fairly slow there already.
gold used -Wl,--gdb-index, except in the _noindex runs. bfd ld doesn't have --gdb-index, so I think fission doesn't work well with it (?). (I also haven't tried actually running the binary under gdb in these builds). (after vs after2 is doing the same 12 hours later, so there's some long-term noise here apparently. I trust the after2 numbers less since they claim gold is faster if it has to compute an index in those numbers, and that seems like nonsense).
I think the summary here is that fission helps a _lot_ more for gold and bfd ld (but even with fission, they're still way slower than lld). The very fastest version here is 1/3rd the speed of lld, and the slowest takes over 45x (!) as long as lld. gold without fission takes way over 10x as long as lld without fission.
$ ~/src/ministat/ministat gcc*
x gcc_bfd_after2.txt
+ gcc_bfd_after.txt
* gcc_bfd_before.txt
% gcc_gold_after2_noindex.txt
# gcc_gold_after2.txt
@ gcc_gold_after.txt
O gcc_gold_before_noindex.txt
~ gcc_gold_before.txt
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|# % x @@ O ~ * |
|## % % x x@@@ ++ OOO ~~~~ * * ** |
|A| MA MA |A|A_| |A |_A| |____A__M_||
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 5 10.555829 11.590927 10.691926 10.836577 0.42719901
+ 5 12.727631 15.063868 13.113123 13.631338 1.0142038
Difference at 95.0% confidence
2.79476 +/- 1.13492
25.7901% +/- 10.4731%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.778174)
* 5 64.289209 70.342028 69.866205 68.286443 2.6778043
Difference at 95.0% confidence
57.4499 +/- 2.79647
530.148% +/- 25.8059%
(Student's t, pooled s = 1.91744)
% 5 6.3529992 7.0316789 6.3846138 6.5051929 0.29492724
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-4.33138 +/- 0.535351
-39.97% +/- 4.94022%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.36707)
# 5 4.0398211 4.4484537 4.1234727 4.1840817 0.16065823
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-6.6525 +/- 0.470684
-61.3893% +/- 4.34347%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.322731)
@ 5 12.177341 13.516762 12.589737 12.712317 0.50764556
Difference at 95.0% confidence
1.87574 +/- 0.684228
17.3093% +/- 6.31406%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.46915)
O 5 42.854285 43.832344 43.634122 43.500009 0.38393929
Difference at 95.0% confidence
32.6634 +/- 0.59234
301.418% +/- 5.46612%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.406146)
~ 5 51.27234 53.16056 52.245277 52.270382 0.69728535
Difference at 95.0% confidence
41.4338 +/- 0.843319
382.351% +/- 7.78215%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.578233)
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D115040/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D115040
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list