[PATCH] D114334: [X86][TTI] Finish costmodel for AVX512BW's VPMOVM2[BW] / VPMOV[BW]2M instructions

[Roman Lebedev via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

lebedev.ri added a comment.

In D114334#3145199 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114334#3145199>, @tschuett wrote:

> I repeat my self. Having the agenda in a diff is suboptimal. Maybe a document in the repo?

In these patches i'm not inventing this suboptimal approach, but merely following the current standard practice, so i'm a little unsure about this sudden negativity.
There are several bugs in bugzilla about that, e.g. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32325 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35784 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36550


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D114334/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D114334