[PATCH] D64454: [clang-tidy] Adding static analyzer check to list of clang-tidy checks

[Balázs Benics via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

steakhal added subscribers: njames93, whisperity, steakhal.
steakhal added a comment.
Herald added subscribers: carlosgalvezp, manas, ASDenysPetrov.
Herald added a project: clang-tools-extra.

It seems like the list got pretty outdated by the time.
Do you think we should really refer to the clang-analyzer checks in this list? What about simply referring to the clangsa docs instead?
I fear, this will be a constant problem in the future.

That being said, a specific grep-like test would suffice to ensure it's always updated, but I would be surprised as a clang static analyzer developer that I need to run the clang-tools-extra tests besides the clang-analysis ones.
It would cause build bot breakages all the time - and just as many revert commits by choosing that direction.

WDYT? @aaron.ballman @njames93 @whisperity


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D64454/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D64454