[PATCH] D112519: parallel-libs: remove some artifacts

[David Blaikie via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

dblaikie added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormattedStatus.rst:7807-7821
-   * - parallel-libs/acxxel
-     - `6`
-     - `4`
-     - `2`
-     - :part:`66%`
-   * - parallel-libs/acxxel/examples
-     - `1`
----------------
I didn't touch this because I think it's autogenerated & figured someone would autogenerate it again at some point?


================
Comment at: clang/docs/tools/clang-formatted-files.txt:7804-7812
-parallel-libs/acxxel/acxxel.cpp
-parallel-libs/acxxel/opencl_acxxel.cpp
-parallel-libs/acxxel/span.h
-parallel-libs/acxxel/status.h
-parallel-libs/acxxel/examples/opencl_example.cpp
-parallel-libs/acxxel/tests/multi_device_test.cpp
-parallel-libs/acxxel/tests/opencl_test.cpp
----------------
I assume this is autogenerated too? Perhaps it isn't, though.


================
Comment at: llvm/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.rst:753
                 libcxx libcxxabi libunwind lld lldb llgo llvm openmp
-                parallel-libs polly pstl )
 
----------------
We probably shouldn't update past proposals - since they were correct when written/used (& it's relevant that parallel-libs was migrated to github, even if we have now/since deleted it)


================
Comment at: llvm/docs/Proposals/VariableNames.rst:341
    * openmp
-   * parallel-libs
    * polly
----------------
/maybe/ this one could be updated, but again - I wonder if it's more suitable to leave it as-is since it was correct when the proposal was made/discussed (though unlike the github migration, this proposal is perhaps still ongoing)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D112519/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D112519