[PATCH] D112198: [MLIR][OpenMP] Fixed the missing inclusive clause in omp.wsloop and fix order clause
Kiran Chandramohan via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Oct 22 03:53:46 PDT 2021
kiranchandramohan added inline comments.
================
Comment at: mlir/test/Dialect/OpenMP/invalid.mlir:150
+ // expected-error @below {{inclusive is not a valid clause}}
+ omp.wsloop (%iv) : index = (%lb) to (%ub) step (%step) nowait inclusive {
+ omp.yield
----------------
Is this an error because inclusive is not placed after ub?
================
Comment at: mlir/test/Dialect/OpenMP/invalid.mlir:158
+func @order_value(%lb : index, %ub : index, %step : index) {
+ // expected-error @below {{attribute 'order_val' failed to satisfy constraint: OrderKind Clause}}
+ omp.wsloop (%iv) : index = (%lb) to (%ub) step (%step) order(default) {
----------------
Why is this an error?
================
Comment at: mlir/test/Dialect/OpenMP/ops.mlir:146
+
+ return
}
----------------
Nit: Is this a formatting character?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D112198/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D112198
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list