[PATCH] D111041: [clang-tidy] Remove 'IgnoreDestructors = true' from cppcoreguidelines-explicit-virtual-functions

Aaron Ballman via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 12 10:49:11 PDT 2021


aaron.ballman added a comment.

In D111041#3059054 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D111041#3059054>, @carlosgalvezp wrote:

> Thanks a lot for the review and the help!
>
> By the way, should we keep the [clang-tidy] header for the next commits? Glancing at the commit history, I think it's much easier to see what the commit is updating, and probably can setup email filters to only receive notifications e.g. when [clang-tidy] is in the commit message. It's also consistent with the rest of commits. For example this one:
>
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a76cfc2e840ff373b80e3a5f84fc48c5f1f90d8a

Eh, I personally don't care all that much one way or the other (so sure, I can do that!), but I recall there being a push to keep the "title" line under something very small (50 chars?) because of the way tools sometimes display this information to users, so I've always stripped the bit within [] to ensure we keep a sufficiently short title.

That said, I'm wondering if you're planning to stick around in the clang-tidy community? If so, given that you've got a few good patches accepted already, it might be time to consider getting you commit privileges of your own. https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#obtaining-commit-access has more details on what that entails.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D111041/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D111041



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list