[llvm] c608b49 - [SCEV] Tweak the algorithm for figuring out if flags must apply to a SCEV [mostly-NFC]
Philip Reames via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 5 11:20:56 PDT 2021
Author: Philip Reames
Date: 2021-10-05T11:20:48-07:00
New Revision: c608b49d67e0c22cc3537569f76af500097cd3b4
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c608b49d67e0c22cc3537569f76af500097cd3b4
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c608b49d67e0c22cc3537569f76af500097cd3b4.diff
LOG: [SCEV] Tweak the algorithm for figuring out if flags must apply to a SCEV [mostly-NFC]
Behavior wise, this patch should be mostly NFC. The only behavior difference known is that on the isSCEVExprNeverPoison path we'll consider a bound imposed by the SCEVable operands (if any).
Algorithmically, it's an invert of the existing code. Previously, we checked for each operand if we could find a bound, then checked for must-execute given that bound. With the patch, we use dominance to refine the innermost bound, then check must execute once. The interesting case is when we have multiple unknowns within a single basic block. While both dominance and must-execute are worst-case linear walks within the block, only dominance is cached. As such, refining based on dominance should be more efficient.
Added:
Modified:
llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
index c3ee802342a50..df1b7c2ad157d 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
@@ -1925,6 +1925,10 @@ class ScalarEvolution {
/// (See scope definition rules associated with flag discussion above)
const Instruction *getDefiningScopeBound(const SCEV *S);
+ /// Return a scope which provides an upper bound on the defining scope for
+ /// a SCEV with the operands in Ops.
+ const Instruction *getDefiningScopeBound(ArrayRef<const SCEV *> Ops);
+
/// Given two instructions in the same function, return true if we can
/// prove B must execute given A executes.
bool isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionTo(const Instruction *A,
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
index bc698a1d9847b..c09180b2c197f 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
@@ -2802,11 +2802,10 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::getAddExpr(SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *> &Ops,
// Proving that entry to the outer scope neccesitates entry to the inner
// scope, thus proves the program undefined if the flags would be violated
// in the outer scope.
- const bool CanPropagateFlags = llvm::any_of(LIOps, [&](const SCEV *S) {
- auto *ReachI = &*AddRecLoop->getHeader()->begin();
- auto *DefI = getDefiningScopeBound(S);
- return isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionTo(DefI, ReachI);
- });
+ auto *DefI = getDefiningScopeBound(LIOps);
+ auto *ReachI = &*AddRecLoop->getHeader()->begin();
+ const bool CanPropagateFlags =
+ isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionTo(DefI, ReachI);
auto AddFlags = CanPropagateFlags ? Flags : SCEV::FlagAnyWrap;
AddRecOps[0] = getAddExpr(LIOps, AddFlags, Depth + 1);
@@ -6594,6 +6593,18 @@ const Instruction *ScalarEvolution::getDefiningScopeBound(const SCEV *S) {
return &*F.getEntryBlock().begin();
}
+const Instruction *
+ScalarEvolution::getDefiningScopeBound(ArrayRef<const SCEV *> Ops) {
+ const Instruction *Bound = &*F.getEntryBlock().begin();
+ for (auto *S : Ops) {
+ auto *DefI = getDefiningScopeBound(S);
+ if (DT.dominates(Bound, DefI))
+ Bound = DefI;
+ }
+ return Bound;
+}
+
+
static bool
isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor(BasicBlock::const_iterator Begin,
BasicBlock::const_iterator End) {
@@ -6657,15 +6668,16 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isSCEVExprNeverPoison(const Instruction *I) {
// executed every time we enter that scope. When the bounding scope is a
// loop (the common case), this is equivalent to proving I executes on every
// iteration of that loop.
+ SmallVector<const SCEV *> SCEVOps;
for (const Use &Op : I->operands()) {
// I could be an extractvalue from a call to an overflow intrinsic.
// TODO: We can do better here in some cases.
- if (!isSCEVable(Op->getType()))
- return false;
- auto *DefI = getDefiningScopeBound(getSCEV(Op));
- if (isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionTo(DefI, I))
- return true;
+ if (isSCEVable(Op->getType()))
+ SCEVOps.push_back(getSCEV(Op));
}
+ auto *DefI = getDefiningScopeBound(SCEVOps);
+ if (isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionTo(DefI, I))
+ return true;
return false;
}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list