[PATCH] D110752: [SimpleLoopUnswitch] Don't unswitch constant conditions
Daniil Suchkov via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 29 12:10:27 PDT 2021
DaniilSuchkov created this revision.
DaniilSuchkov added reviewers: aqjune, aeubanks.
Herald added a subscriber: hiraditya.
DaniilSuchkov requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: LLVM.
Herald added a subscriber: llvm-commits.
Added an additional check for constants after simplification of `select _, true, false` pattern.
Also I added an assertion that'll make sure we aren't trying to replace constants, so it will help us prevent such bugs in future. The assertion from D110751 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D110751> is another layer of protection against such cases.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D110752
Files:
llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimpleLoopUnswitch.cpp
llvm/test/Transforms/SimpleLoopUnswitch/nontrivial-unswitch-invariant-select-bug.ll
Index: llvm/test/Transforms/SimpleLoopUnswitch/nontrivial-unswitch-invariant-select-bug.ll
===================================================================
--- llvm/test/Transforms/SimpleLoopUnswitch/nontrivial-unswitch-invariant-select-bug.ll
+++ llvm/test/Transforms/SimpleLoopUnswitch/nontrivial-unswitch-invariant-select-bug.ll
@@ -1,33 +1,22 @@
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
-; REQUIRES: asserts
-; XFAIL: *
; RUN: opt -passes='simple-loop-unswitch<nontrivial>' -S < %s | FileCheck %s
-; FIXME: We should not replace `true` with `false` here!
+; If we try to replace uses of `true` outside of `@foo`, we'll see it here.
define i1 @bar() {
; CHECK-LABEL: @bar(
-; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 false
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true
;
ret i1 true
}
-; FIXME: We shouldn't unswitch this loop!
+; We shouldn't unswitch this loop.
define void @foo() {
; CHECK-LABEL: @foo(
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
-; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 true, label [[ENTRY_SPLIT_US:%.*]], label [[ENTRY_SPLIT:%.*]]
-; CHECK: entry.split.us:
-; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[HEADER_US:%.*]]
-; CHECK: header.us:
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[VAL_US:%.*]] = select i1 true, i1 true, i1 false
-; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[EXIT_SPLIT_US:%.*]]
-; CHECK: exit.split.us:
-; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[EXIT:%.*]]
-; CHECK: entry.split:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[HEADER:%.*]]
; CHECK: header:
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[VAL:%.*]] = select i1 false, i1 false, i1 false
-; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[HEADER]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[VAL:%.*]] = select i1 true, i1 true, i1 false
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 true, label [[EXIT:%.*]], label [[HEADER]]
; CHECK: exit:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
;
Index: llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimpleLoopUnswitch.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimpleLoopUnswitch.cpp
+++ llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimpleLoopUnswitch.cpp
@@ -2370,7 +2370,9 @@
ConstantInt *ContinueReplacement =
Direction ? ConstantInt::getFalse(BI->getContext())
: ConstantInt::getTrue(BI->getContext());
- for (Value *Invariant : Invariants)
+ for (Value *Invariant : Invariants) {
+ assert(!isa<Constant>(Invariant) &&
+ "Should not be replacing constant values!");
// Use make_early_inc_range here as set invalidates the iterator.
for (Use &U : llvm::make_early_inc_range(Invariant->uses())) {
Instruction *UserI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
@@ -2385,6 +2387,7 @@
DT.dominates(ClonedPH, UserI->getParent()))
U.set(UnswitchedReplacement);
}
+ }
}
// We can change which blocks are exit blocks of all the cloned sibling
@@ -2727,6 +2730,9 @@
Cond = CondNext;
BI->setCondition(Cond);
+ if (isa<Constant>(Cond))
+ continue;
+
if (L.isLoopInvariant(BI->getCondition())) {
UnswitchCandidates.push_back({BI, {BI->getCondition()}});
continue;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D110752.375988.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3006 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20210929/703f21fa/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list