[PATCH] D110332: [DebugInfo] Limit the size of DIExpressions that we will salvage up to

[David Blaikie via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

dblaikie added a comment.

(would need test coverage - which might help answer my main question: What sort of large expressions are observed in practice? Could they be simplified, rather than dropped? (I think it's probably still right/good to have a limit, but if hitting the limit is often reflective of some suboptimal representational choice in how the dwarf expression is formed, that could be optimized down to something more compact - that's something to be aware of/keep an eye on probably))


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D110332/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D110332