[PATCH] D110259: [SVE][Analysis] Tune the cost model according to the tune-cpu attribute
Sander de Smalen via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 23 01:47:27 PDT 2021
sdesmalen added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64Subtarget.cpp:359
+ unsigned MaxVScale = 16;
+ // Bail out if we don't have a Function
+ if (!F)
----------------
nit: redundant comment, the code says the same thing, just shorter :)
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64Subtarget.cpp:378
+
+ if (F && F->hasFnAttribute(Attribute::VScaleRange)) {
+ unsigned Arg =
----------------
1. F is already known to be != nullptr.
2. For consistency, can you do the same as above here, get the attribute and then check whether it's valid (as opposed to checking whether the function has the attribute.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D110259/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D110259
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list