[PATCH] D109310: [NPM] Added -print-pipeline-passes print params for a few passes.

[Markus Lavin via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

markus added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/LoopExtractor.cpp:292
+  OS << "<";
+  if (NumLoops == 1)
+    OS << "single";
----------------
aeubanks wrote:
> maybe we can directly print `NumLoops` (and change the parsing)
I do not disagree but isn't it better to do that in a separate commit?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D109310/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D109310