[PATCH] D108583: [WebAssembly] Use SSAUpdaterBulk in LowerEmscriptenSjLj
Heejin Ahn via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 23 13:46:36 PDT 2021
aheejin created this revision.
aheejin added reviewers: dschuff, tlively.
Herald added subscribers: wingo, ecnelises, sunfish, hiraditya, jgravelle-google, sbc100.
aheejin requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: LLVM.
Herald added a subscriber: llvm-commits.
We update SSA in two steps in Emscripten SjLj:
1. Rewrite uses of `setjmpTable` and `setjmpTableSize` variables and place `phi`s where necessary, which are updated where we call `saveSetjmp`.
2. Do a whole function level SSA update for all variables, because we split BBs where `setjmp` is called and there are possibly variable uses that are not dominated by a def. (See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/955b91c19c00ed4c917559a5d66d14c669dde2e3/llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenEHSjLj.cpp#L1314-L1324)
We have been using `SSAUpdater` to do this, but `SSAUpdaterBulk` class
was added after this pass was first created, and for the step 2 it looks
like a better alternative with a possible performance benefit. Not sure
the author is aware of it, but `SSAUpdaterBulk` seems to have a
limitation: it cannot handle a use within the same BB as a def but
before it. For example:
... = %a + 1
%a = foo();
or
%a = %a + 1
The uses `%a` in RHS should be rewritten with another SSA variable of
`%a`, most likely one generated from a `phi`. But `SSAUpdaterBulk`
thinks all uses of `%a` are below the def of `%a` within the same BB.
(`SSAUpdater` has two different functions of rewriting because of this:
`RewriteUse` and `RewriteUseAfterInsertions`.) This doesn't affect our
usage in the step 2 because that deals with possibly non-dominated uses
by defs after block splitting. But it does in the step 1, which still
uses `SSAUpdater`.
But this CL also simplifies the step 1 by using `make_early_inc_range`,
removing the need to advance the iterator before rewriting a use.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
https://reviews.llvm.org/D108583
Files:
llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenEHSjLj.cpp
llvm/test/CodeGen/WebAssembly/lower-em-sjlj.ll
Index: llvm/test/CodeGen/WebAssembly/lower-em-sjlj.ll
===================================================================
--- llvm/test/CodeGen/WebAssembly/lower-em-sjlj.ll
+++ llvm/test/CodeGen/WebAssembly/lower-em-sjlj.ll
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
; CHECK-NEXT: %[[SETJMP_TABLE_SIZE1:.*]] = call i32 @getTempRet0()
; CHECK: if.then.split:
-; CHECK: %[[VAR1:.*]] = phi i32 [ %[[VAR0]], %if.then ], [ %[[VAR2:.*]], %if.end3 ]
+; CHECK: %[[VAR1:.*]] = phi i32 [ %[[VAR2:.*]], %if.end3 ], [ %[[VAR0]], %if.then ]
; CHECK: %[[SETJMP_TABLE_SIZE2:.*]] = phi i32 [ %[[SETJMP_TABLE_SIZE1]], %if.then ], [ %[[SETJMP_TABLE_SIZE3:.*]], %if.end3 ]
; CHECK: %[[SETJMP_TABLE2:.*]] = phi i32* [ %[[SETJMP_TABLE1]], %if.then ], [ %[[SETJMP_TABLE3:.*]], %if.end3 ]
; CHECK: store i32 %[[VAR1]], i32* @global_var, align 4
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@
br label %for.cond
; CHECK: for.inc.split:
- ; CHECK: %var[[VARNO]] = phi i32 [ %var, %for.inc ]
+ ; CHECK: %var[[VARNO]] = phi i32 [ undef, %if.end ], [ %var, %for.inc ]
}
; Tests cases where longjmp function pointer is used in other ways than direct
Index: llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenEHSjLj.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenEHSjLj.cpp
+++ llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenEHSjLj.cpp
@@ -200,6 +200,7 @@
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/SSAUpdater.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/SSAUpdaterBulk.h"
using namespace llvm;
@@ -641,25 +642,23 @@
void WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenEHSjLj::rebuildSSA(Function &F) {
DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>(F).getDomTree();
DT.recalculate(F); // CFG has been changed
- SSAUpdater SSA;
+ SSAUpdaterBulk SSA;
for (BasicBlock &BB : F) {
for (Instruction &I : BB) {
- SSA.Initialize(I.getType(), I.getName());
- SSA.AddAvailableValue(&BB, &I);
- for (auto UI = I.use_begin(), UE = I.use_end(); UI != UE;) {
- Use &U = *UI;
- ++UI;
+ unsigned VarID = SSA.AddVariable(I.getName(), I.getType());
+ SSA.AddAvailableValue(VarID, &BB, &I);
+ for (auto &U : I.uses()) {
auto *User = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
if (auto *UserPN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(User))
if (UserPN->getIncomingBlock(U) == &BB)
continue;
-
if (DT.dominates(&I, User))
continue;
- SSA.RewriteUseAfterInsertions(U);
+ SSA.AddUse(VarID, &U);
}
}
}
+ SSA.RewriteAllUses(&DT);
}
// Replace uses of longjmp with emscripten_longjmp. emscripten_longjmp takes
@@ -1301,24 +1300,14 @@
for (Instruction *I : SetjmpTableSizeInsts)
SetjmpTableSizeSSA.AddAvailableValue(I->getParent(), I);
- for (auto UI = SetjmpTable->use_begin(), UE = SetjmpTable->use_end();
- UI != UE;) {
- // Grab the use before incrementing the iterator.
- Use &U = *UI;
- // Increment the iterator before removing the use from the list.
- ++UI;
+ for (auto &U : make_early_inc_range(SetjmpTable->uses()))
if (auto *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(U.getUser()))
if (I->getParent() != Entry)
SetjmpTableSSA.RewriteUse(U);
- }
- for (auto UI = SetjmpTableSize->use_begin(), UE = SetjmpTableSize->use_end();
- UI != UE;) {
- Use &U = *UI;
- ++UI;
+ for (auto &U : make_early_inc_range(SetjmpTableSize->uses()))
if (auto *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(U.getUser()))
if (I->getParent() != Entry)
SetjmpTableSizeSSA.RewriteUse(U);
- }
// Finally, our modifications to the cfg can break dominance of SSA variables.
// For example, in this code,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D108583.368206.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3743 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20210823/c7759ded/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list