[PATCH] D106891: [AMDGPU] [Remarks] Emit optimization remarks for FP atomics
Anshil Gandhi via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 6 11:20:39 PDT 2021
gandhi21299 marked 2 inline comments as done.
gandhi21299 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIISelLowering.cpp:12120
+ OptimizationRemarkEmitter *ORE,
+ OptimizationRemark OptRemark) {
+ ORE->emit([&]() { return OptRemark; });
----------------
rampitec wrote:
> gandhi21299 wrote:
> > rampitec wrote:
> > > Why OptRemark and not just StringRef? I really want to see as little churn as possible at the call site.
> > With only StringRef, we would also have to pass in RMW since OptimizationRemark constructor depends on that.
> It seems better be a lamda where you can just capture most of the stuff.
What would the type be for the following lambda?
```
[&](){
return OptimizationRemark(...);
}
```
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D106891/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D106891
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list