[PATCH] D107298: Fix ValueTracking computeConstantRange to use "may" instead of "always" semantics for llvm.assume

[Nikita Popov via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rGb58eda39eb1f: [ValueTracking] Fix computeConstantRange to use "may" instead of "always"… (authored by clin1, committed by nikic).

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D107298/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D107298

Files:
  llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
  llvm/unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp


Index: llvm/unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp
+++ llvm/unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp
@@ -2073,7 +2073,7 @@
     //  * x.1 >= 5
     //  * x.2 < x.1
     //
-    // stride = [0, 5)
+    // stride = [0, -1)
     auto M = parseModule(R"(
   declare void @llvm.assume(i1)
 
@@ -2088,17 +2088,45 @@
     Function *F = M->getFunction("test");
 
     AssumptionCache AC(*F);
+    Value *X1 = &*(F->arg_begin());
     Value *X2 = &*std::next(F->arg_begin());
 
     Instruction *I = &findInstructionByName(F, "stride.plus.one");
-    ConstantRange CR1 = computeConstantRange(X2, true, &AC, I);
-    EXPECT_EQ(0, CR1.getLower());
-    EXPECT_EQ(5, CR1.getUpper());
+    ConstantRange CR1 = computeConstantRange(X1, true, &AC, I);
+    ConstantRange CR2 = computeConstantRange(X2, true, &AC, I);
+
+    EXPECT_EQ(5, CR1.getLower());
+    EXPECT_EQ(0, CR1.getUpper());
+
+    EXPECT_EQ(0, CR2.getLower());
+    EXPECT_EQ(0xffffffff, CR2.getUpper());
 
     // Check the depth cutoff results in a conservative result (full set) by
     // passing Depth == MaxDepth == 6.
-    ConstantRange CR2 = computeConstantRange(X2, true, &AC, I, 6);
-    EXPECT_TRUE(CR2.isFullSet());
+    ConstantRange CR3 = computeConstantRange(X2, true, &AC, I, 6);
+    EXPECT_TRUE(CR3.isFullSet());
+  }
+  {
+    // Assumptions:
+    //  * x.2 <= x.1
+    auto M = parseModule(R"(
+  declare void @llvm.assume(i1)
+
+  define i32 @test(i32 %x.1, i32 %x.2) {
+    %lt = icmp ule i32 %x.2, %x.1
+    call void @llvm.assume(i1 %lt)
+    %stride.plus.one = add nsw nuw i32 %x.1, 1
+    ret i32 %stride.plus.one
+  })");
+    Function *F = M->getFunction("test");
+
+    AssumptionCache AC(*F);
+    Value *X2 = &*std::next(F->arg_begin());
+
+    Instruction *I = &findInstructionByName(F, "stride.plus.one");
+    ConstantRange CR1 = computeConstantRange(X2, true, &AC, I);
+    // If we don't know the value of x.2, we don't know the value of x.1.
+    EXPECT_TRUE(CR1.isFullSet());
   }
 }
 
Index: llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
+++ llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
@@ -7037,7 +7037,7 @@
       ConstantRange RHS = computeConstantRange(Cmp->getOperand(1), UseInstrInfo,
                                                AC, I, Depth + 1);
       CR = CR.intersectWith(
-          ConstantRange::makeSatisfyingICmpRegion(Cmp->getPredicate(), RHS));
+          ConstantRange::makeAllowedICmpRegion(Cmp->getPredicate(), RHS));
     }
   }
 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D107298.363558.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2655 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20210802/91893913/attachment.bin>