[PATCH] D106426: [FuncSpec] Support specialising recursive functions
Sjoerd Meijer via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jul 23 01:06:18 PDT 2021
SjoerdMeijer added a comment.
Okay, if we want to do this here, then we need clarity on the exact problem, which is lacking at the moment. You mentioned "scary" a few times, but there's nothing scary here. ;-) First of all, this is an extra option that people need to buy into, so changes won't bother anyone.
About the suspected problem:
> I think the problem may come from there is no restriction between iterations.
I don't think this is the case. In next iterations, exactly the same cost-model and heuristics are applied. Thus, I expect that if a function was not specialised before, it won't be specialised in a next iteration. Except, for recursive functions that need to be triggered by a very specific optimisation first between iterations.
Thus, without exact clarity of the problem, this feels like a premature optimisation to me, so we can do 2 things:
- I guess it's up to me to show with performance numbers if there is a problem or not. Before doing that, I would appreciate if you can elaborate on the suspected problems (just to make sure I understand them).
- if you're happy with my explanation thus far, and that this is an opt-in anyway, we can defer the compile time analysis that I need to do anyway when I plan to look into enable function specialisation by default.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D106426/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D106426
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list