[PATCH] D101759: [PowerPC] Scalar IBM MASS library conversion pass

[Masoud Ataei via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

masoud.ataei marked 9 inline comments as done.
masoud.ataei added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.cpp:1370
+  // to be consistent to PPCGenScalarMASSEntries pass
+  if (TM.Options.PPCGenScalarMASSEntries && TM.Options.ApproxFuncFPMath) {
+    if (TM.Options.NoInfsFPMath && TM.Options.NoNaNsFPMath &&
----------------
bmahjour wrote:
> if someone compiles with -Ofast without any extra options, would `TM.Options.ApproxFuncFPMath` be true here?
In clang changes, I had `Options.ApproxFuncFPMath = LangOpts.ApproxFunc;` in `clang/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp`. That was responsible to update this TM option based on the clang approximate func option. And clang approximate func option will be set with -Ofast. 

Then, the answer for your question is yes. 


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D101759/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D101759