[PATCH] D105866: [lld-macho] Use intermediate arrays to store opcodes
Vincent Lee via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 15 16:01:04 PDT 2021
thevinster marked an inline comment as done.
thevinster added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lld/MachO/SyntheticSections.cpp:281-282
+struct BindIR {
+ uint8_t opcode = 0xF0;
+ uint64_t data = 0;
+};
----------------
int3 wrote:
> do we need these default values?
Probably not, since we always construct these values explicitly. But, the reason for having it as default is 1/ follow the convention of `Binding` struct and 2/ in the event that something goes awry, `0xF0` is not valid opcode and should make the program scream instead of accidentally writing "valid" values.
Plus, I think it'll debugging easier if we see these specific values when debugging.
================
Comment at: lld/MachO/SyntheticSections.cpp:298-299
if (lastBinding.segment != seg) {
- os << static_cast<uint8_t>(BIND_OPCODE_SET_SEGMENT_AND_OFFSET_ULEB |
- seg->index);
- encodeULEB128(offset, os);
+ opcodes.push_back(
+ {BIND_OPCODE_SET_SEGMENT_AND_OFFSET_ULEB | seg->index, offset});
lastBinding.segment = seg;
----------------
int3 wrote:
> ah I guess we need the cast
Fwiw, the tests did pass. I'll revert to the old implementation.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D105866/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D105866
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list