[PATCH] D106013: [Verifier] Require same signature for intrinsic calls
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 14 15:22:23 PDT 2021
dexonsmith added a comment.
In D106013#2878499 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106013#2878499>, @nikic wrote:
> @dexonsmith I don't think upholding invariants during transforms is really the problem here. The problem is that something like this is legal C code:
>
> extern void one_arg(unsigned);
> int main() {
> if (0) {
> ((void(*)(void)) one_arg)();
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> With opaque pointers (where there are no pointer bitcasts) this is going to lower to a call that has a different signature from the callee. We can't make that a verifier error.
Right, no pointer bitcasts at all -- I was somehow thinking there were still pointer-to-function bitcasts (just fewer of them, since pointers were collapsed in their parameter lists). Thanks for walking me through it.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D106013/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D106013
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list