[PATCH] D103882: [CostModel][AArch64] Make loads/stores of <vscale x 1 x eltty> expensive.

[Sander de Smalen via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

sdesmalen updated this revision to Diff 357906.
sdesmalen added a comment.

Use getInvalid() instead of getMax().

The downside is that this will increase the number of instructions printed
in the opt-remark (D105806 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D105806>) but I agree that it seems more correct to
mark them as Invalid, since we can't safely code-generate these types
at the moment.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D103882/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D103882

Files:
  llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64TargetTransformInfo.cpp
  llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/masked_ldst.ll
  llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/sve-gather.ll
  llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/sve-ldst.ll
  llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/sve-scatter.ll
  llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-inductions.ll

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D103882.357906.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 11618 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20210712/2059843f/attachment.bin>