[PATCH] D105268: [X86] AVX512FP16 instructions enabling 5/6

Pengfei Wang via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 5 18:35:03 PDT 2021


pengfei added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-folding-fp-avx512fp16vl-fma.ll:193-194
+define <8 x half> @stack_fold_fmsub123ph(<8 x half> %a0, <8 x half> %a1, <8 x half> %a2) {
+  ;check-label: stack_fold_fmsub123ph:
+  ;check:       vfmsub213ph {{-?[0-9]*}}(%rsp), {{%xmm[0-9][0-9]*}}, {{%xmm[0-9][0-9]*}} {{.*#+}} 16-byte folded reload
+  %1 = tail call <2 x i64> asm sideeffect "nop", "=x,~{xmm3},~{xmm4},~{xmm5},~{xmm6},~{xmm7},~{xmm8},~{xmm9},~{xmm10},~{xmm11},~{xmm12},~{xmm13},~{xmm14},~{xmm15},~{xmm16},~{xmm17},~{xmm18},~{xmm19},~{xmm20},~{xmm21},~{xmm22},~{xmm23},~{xmm24},~{xmm25},~{xmm26},~{xmm27},~{xmm28},~{xmm29},~{xmm30},~{xmm31},~{flags}"()
----------------
spatel wrote:
> I was just scanning through this patch and noticed the capitalization mismatch on these lines and others. This test has no valid checks as written?
Good catch! Yes, these two tests were manually written and lit doesn't report fail for such mismatch.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D105268/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D105268



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list