[PATCH] D103177: [flang][driver] Extend the `flang` bash script to act as a driver
Andrzej Warzynski via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jul 2 02:05:26 PDT 2021
awarzynski added a comment.
In D103177#2854933 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103177#2854933>, @DavidSpickett wrote:
> @awarzynski We have some fortran failures in the test suite after this commit:
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/184/builds/109
Thanks for reporting this @DavidSpickett !
> Not totally sure this is the cause but it's the only fortran related commit. Some fp related option being dropped or re-ordered?
Yes, it looks like it's related, but it's not immediately obvious how exactly! I've tried testing this patch with LLVM's test-suite, but CMake does not support LLVM Flang yet: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2021-June/000745.html. I've asked around and AFAIK, no one yet has been able to use LLVM Flang with the test-suite. So I'm not sure how people managed to set-up that BuildBot worker to work :)
> Oh and that bot is running on SVE hardware but I don't think it's that, it just happens to be the only flang bot that has the test suite enabled.
There is another one here: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/179. Oddly, it doesn't complain. Also, @rovka kindly tested this patch using that worker's config before it was merged.
So, any clue what the difference between the two workers is?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D103177/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D103177
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list