[PATCH] D104546: [CSSPGO][llvm-profgen] Handle reurn to external transition.
Hongtao Yu via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 21 17:50:16 PDT 2021
hoy added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/tools/llvm-profgen/PerfReader.cpp:464
+
+ if (Binary->addressIsReturn(Src)) {
+ // In a callback case, a return from internal code, say A, to external
----------------
wenlei wrote:
> If we have a transition from A to B, which is in the form of A calling <external> and <external> calling B, we would form artificial branch from A to B as well. But the same issue with unwinder still exists, right?
>
> So IIUC, the bail out condition should be A and B are not the same frame/function? In order for artificial branch to work with unwinder, the original execution flow can't involve extra external frames.
The processing order here is in reversed timing order. E..g, we are processing a trace from latest to oldest like:
[C, D] [E, F] [ext, B] [ext, ext] .... , [A, ext], and now we are at [A, ext], without this change we would group [ext, B] (cached by `PrevTrDst`) and [A, ext] to form an artificial branch. With this change, we only keep processed traces up to [E, F].
Checking A and B are not in the same function can narrow down the cases. But even if they are in the same function, returning from A to runtime and then form to A ends up with an artificial branch meaning A returning to A can still be confusing, since there may not be a callsite corresponding to that.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104546/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104546
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list