[PATCH] D104625: [NewPM] Print passes with params when using "opt -print-passes"

[Arthur Eubanks via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

aeubanks added a comment.

could you add to the existing -print-passes test one loop pass and one function pass?

formatting

I'm worried that these will get out of sync with the actual implementation, but maybe that doesn't matter so much

another worry is that I believe some of these parsers accept multiple options, but that's not really mentioned in the semicolon separated list, WDYT?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D104625/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D104625