[PATCH] D104245: [GlobalISel] Describe undefined values for G_SBFX/G_UBFX operands

[Matt Arsenault via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

arsenm added a comment.

In D104245#2825719 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D104245#2825719>, @aemerson wrote:

> Shouldn't we also have verifier checks for these requirements in the statically known cases?

No because the verifier should not be considering the context of the instruction. The operands are legal or not looking at just the instruction itself


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D104245/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D104245