[PATCH] D103321: [AMDGPU] Stop mulhi from doing 24 bit mul for uniform values

[David Stuttard via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

dstuttard added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUSubtarget.h:166
+  bool hasSMulHi() const {
+    return HasSMulHi;
+  }
----------------
foad wrote:
> dstuttard wrote:
> > foad wrote:
> > > I would just put the >= GFX9 test in here. No need for a HasSMulHi field. There are plenty of precedents for this.
> > Having given this some thought I'm not sure that I agree - the precedent in the implementation is to do something like I've implemented. That's the consistent thing to do.
> > Is there a good reason not to (other than it is slightly less code?) - implemented this way it is a lot clearer too.
> Both implementations ultimately say that s_mul_hi is supported on gfx9+. Mine just has fewer moving parts. I don't find yours clearer.
Until there's a variant at some point in the future that doesn't have SMulHi (although I guess the implementation can be changed if that ever occurs).


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D103321/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D103321