[PATCH] D104150: [test-suite] NIST Fortran Compiler Validation Suite.

Nichols A. Romero via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 17 08:35:40 PDT 2021


naromero77 added a comment.

In D104150#2818673 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D104150#2818673>, @rovka wrote:

> Is this expected to pass with current upstream flang?
> I gave this a quick spin on an AArch64 machine similar to our buildbots (same hardware, not necessarily same ubuntu version, system compiler etc) and I'm seeing one failure in FM509:
>
>   /path/to/build/bin/flang -DNDEBUG  -w -Werror=date-time -c /path/to/llvm-test-suite/Fortran/UnitTests/fcvs21_f95/FM509.f -o CMakeFiles/FM509.dir/FM509.f.o
>   f18-c234.f90:237:12:
>   
>     237 |  CALL sn512(c1n001(5)(2:9), cvcomp)
>         |            1
>   Error: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument ‘c1d001’ (19/48) at (1)
>   execvp(gfortran) failed: 
>   flang: in /path/to/test-suite-sandbox/build/Fortran/UnitTests/fcvs21_f95, f18 failed with exit status 0: /path/to/build/bin/f18 -module-suffix .f18.mod -DNDEBUG -w -Werror=date-time -c /path/to/llvm-test-suite/Fortran/UnitTests/fcvs21_f95/FM509.f -o CMakeFiles/FM509.dir/FM509.f.o
>
> I'm attaching the produced f18-c234.f90 in case anyone wants to have a look. F17403672: f18-c234.f90 <https://reviews.llvm.org/F17403672>

Sorry for the slow reply. I am on vacation this week and will return to a regular schedule next week. I had no failures with an GCC 7.5, but did have one failure with GCC 10.2 with this same test. Are you using the Flang throw away driver? If so, which GCC are you using.

It would be pretty easy to remove this test if we decided that is the best thing to do.


Repository:
  rT test-suite

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D104150/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D104150



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list