[PATCH] D104043: [IR] Value: Fix OpCode checks

Sami Tolvanen via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 10 09:29:04 PDT 2021


samitolvanen created this revision.
Herald added subscribers: dexonsmith, hiraditya.
samitolvanen requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: LLVM.
Herald added a subscriber: llvm-commits.

Value::SubclassID cannot be directly compared to Instruction enums, such as
Instruction::{Call,Invoke,CallBr}. We have to first subtract InstructionVal
from the SubclassID to get the OpCode, similar to Instruction::getOpCode().


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

https://reviews.llvm.org/D104043

Files:
  llvm/lib/IR/Value.cpp


Index: llvm/lib/IR/Value.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/lib/IR/Value.cpp
+++ llvm/lib/IR/Value.cpp
@@ -58,8 +58,11 @@
   // FIXME: Why isn't this in the subclass gunk??
   // Note, we cannot call isa<CallInst> before the CallInst has been
   // constructed.
-  if (SubclassID == Instruction::Call || SubclassID == Instruction::Invoke ||
-      SubclassID == Instruction::CallBr)
+  unsigned OpCode = 0;
+  if (SubclassID >= InstructionVal)
+    OpCode = SubclassID - InstructionVal;
+  if (OpCode == Instruction::Call || OpCode == Instruction::Invoke ||
+      OpCode == Instruction::CallBr)
     assert((VTy->isFirstClassType() || VTy->isVoidTy() || VTy->isStructTy()) &&
            "invalid CallInst type!");
   else if (SubclassID != BasicBlockVal &&


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D104043.351199.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 805 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20210610/648c3c76/attachment.bin>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list