[llvm] dec3154 - [Docs] Fix incorrect return type for example code

[Jim Lin via llvm-commits]

Author: Jim Lin
Date: 2021-06-10T14:20:11+08:00
New Revision: dec3154c161cea85f3fd66e0dbc82259dd6acc83

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dec3154c161cea85f3fd66e0dbc82259dd6acc83
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dec3154c161cea85f3fd66e0dbc82259dd6acc83.diff

LOG: [Docs] Fix incorrect return type for example code

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    llvm/docs/Vectorizers.rst

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/llvm/docs/Vectorizers.rst b/llvm/docs/Vectorizers.rst
index a6565d4f8f166..dd2cce1a043bc 100644
--- a/llvm/docs/Vectorizers.rst
+++ b/llvm/docs/Vectorizers.rst
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ that scatter/gathers memory.
 
 .. code-block:: c++
 
-  int foo(int * A, int * B, int n) {
+  void foo(int * A, int * B, int n) {
     for (intptr_t i = 0; i < n; ++i)
         A[i] += B[i * 4];
   }
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ vectorization is profitable.
 
 .. code-block:: c++
 
-  int foo(int *A, char *B, int n) {
+  void foo(int *A, char *B, int n) {
     for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
       A[i] += 4 * B[i];
   }
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ ignored (as other compilers do) are still being left un-vectorized.
 
   struct { int A[100], K, B[100]; } Foo;
 
-  int foo() {
+  void foo() {
     for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i)
       Foo.A[i] = Foo.B[i] + 100;
   }