[PATCH] D103292: [lld-macho] Implement ICF

[Jez Ng via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

int3 added a comment.

> Yes, that's the place it's really used. Does that use justify the .75% overhead? The alternative is making an isec-to-defined map when isec->icfEquivalenceClass & (1ull << 63) .

Do the other LLD backends deal with a similar problem, or is this unique to us/Mach-O's format?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D103292/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D103292