[PATCH] D103362: [LoopUnroll] Separate peeling from unrolling

[Nikita Popov via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

nikic updated this revision to Diff 348653.
nikic edited the summary of this revision.
nikic added a comment.

Yes, silently ignoring one option isn't good. I've changed the code to emit an error if both options are specified.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D103362/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D103362

Files:
  llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/UnrollLoop.h
  llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnrollPass.cpp
  llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp
  llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnrollRuntime.cpp
  llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop-and-unroll.ll
  llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/pr33437.ll
  llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/pr45939-peel-count-and-complete-unroll.ll
  llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/wrong_assert_in_peeling.ll

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D103362.348653.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 29550 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20210529/593727e7/attachment.bin>