[PATCH] D102096: [DAGCombiner] Fix DAG combine store elimination, different address space.

[Hendrik Greving via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

hgreving updated this revision to Diff 344434.
hgreving added a comment.

Removed :gs versions in the test.
Added indexed store tests.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D102096/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D102096

Files:
  llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
  llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dagcombine-dead-store.ll


Index: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dagcombine-dead-store.ll
===================================================================
--- llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dagcombine-dead-store.ll
+++ llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dagcombine-dead-store.ll
@@ -5,11 +5,10 @@
 ; The test's 'same' and 'diff' notation depicts the pointer value exposing bugs hitting
 ; corner cases where the case where the pointer value is either the same, or different.
 
-; FIXME: DAG combine incorrectly eliminates store if pointer is of same value.
-
 ; CHECK-LABEL: copy_fs_same:
 ; CHECK: # %bb.0:
 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl 1, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: movl %eax, %fs:1
 ; CHECK-NEXT: retl
 define i32 @copy_fs_same() {
 entry:
@@ -34,6 +33,7 @@
 ; CHECK: # %bb.0:
 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %eax
 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl %eax, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: movl %eax, %fs:1
 ; CHECK-NEXT: retl
 define void @output_fs_same(i32 %v) {
 entry:
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %eax
 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl %eax, 168(%ecx)
+; CHECK-NEXT: movl %eax, %fs:168(%ecx)
 ; CHECK-NEXT: retl
 define void @output_indexed_fs_same(i32 %v, i32* %b) {
   %p = getelementptr i32, i32* %b, i64 42
Index: llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
+++ llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
@@ -17916,6 +17916,7 @@
   if (LoadSDNode *Ld = dyn_cast<LoadSDNode>(Value)) {
     if (Ld->getBasePtr() == Ptr && ST->getMemoryVT() == Ld->getMemoryVT() &&
         ST->isUnindexed() && ST->isSimple() &&
+        Ld->getAddressSpace() == ST->getAddressSpace() &&
         // There can't be any side effects between the load and store, such as
         // a call or store.
         Chain.reachesChainWithoutSideEffects(SDValue(Ld, 1))) {
@@ -17929,7 +17930,8 @@
     if (ST->isUnindexed() && ST->isSimple() &&
         ST1->isUnindexed() && ST1->isSimple()) {
       if (ST1->getBasePtr() == Ptr && ST1->getValue() == Value &&
-          ST->getMemoryVT() == ST1->getMemoryVT()) {
+          ST->getMemoryVT() == ST1->getMemoryVT() &&
+          ST->getAddressSpace() == ST1->getAddressSpace()) {
         // If this is a store followed by a store with the same value to the
         // same location, then the store is dead/noop.
         return Chain;
@@ -17940,7 +17942,8 @@
           // BaseIndexOffset and the code below requires knowing the size
           // of a vector, so bail out if MemoryVT is scalable.
           !ST->getMemoryVT().isScalableVector() &&
-          !ST1->getMemoryVT().isScalableVector()) {
+          !ST1->getMemoryVT().isScalableVector() &&
+          ST->getAddressSpace() == ST1->getAddressSpace()) {
         const BaseIndexOffset STBase = BaseIndexOffset::match(ST, DAG);
         const BaseIndexOffset ChainBase = BaseIndexOffset::match(ST1, DAG);
         unsigned STBitSize = ST->getMemoryVT().getFixedSizeInBits();


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D102096.344434.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2955 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20210511/4e56abc5/attachment.bin>