[PATCH] D102073: [TargetLowering] Legalize "vscale x 1" types in more cases
Craig Topper via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri May 7 09:29:04 PDT 2021
craig.topper added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/legalize-scalable-vectortype.ll:2
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv32 -mattr=+experimental-v -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv64 -mattr=+experimental-v -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck %s
----------------
frasercrmck wrote:
> craig.topper wrote:
> > These tests don't cover widening do they?
> True, they don't. To be honest I was specifically targeting the promotion but the code looks like it should handle widening okay. I'm not sure we have an RVV case where we have to widen an illegal `<vscale x 1 x ty>` type to a legal one.
I can't remember if the caller can handle widening scalable vectors properly. I fought with this code before when we tried to use types like <vscale x 6 x ty> for x6 segment load/stores.
Can the vectorize create these <vscale x 4 x i5> types that need promotion?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D102073/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D102073
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list