[PATCH] D101062: [AArch64][SVE] Better utilisation of unpredicated forms of arithmetic intrinsics
Sander de Smalen via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu May 6 03:27:00 PDT 2021
sdesmalen added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp:13856
+ // Look through cast.
+ SDValue &Op = N;
+ while (Op.getOpcode() == AArch64ISD::REINTERPRET_CAST) {
----------------
peterwaller-arm wrote:
> Potential surprise: because it's a ref, updating Op is going to update N. So, why not just update N in the first place, or avoid using a reference? Might be surprising behaviour - I'd expect that if you're using an extra variable, it's to preserve N's original value, which isn't happening here.
or just make it a `const SDValue &Op` ?
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp:17693
+bool AArch64TargetLowering::isAllActivePredicate(SDValue N) const {
+ return ::isAllActivePredicate(N);
+}
----------------
What is the value of implementing `isAllActivePredicate` in a separate, local function?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D101062/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D101062
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list