[PATCH] D101855: [lld-macho] Check simulator platforms to avoid issuing false positive errors.
Vy Nguyen via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 4 15:20:05 PDT 2021
oontvoo marked an inline comment as not done.
oontvoo added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lld/MachO/InputFiles.cpp:144
+ // Mapping of platform to simulator and vice-versa.
+ static std::map<PlatformKind, PlatformKind> *platformMap = []() {
+ auto *ret = new std::map<PlatformKind, PlatformKind>();
----------------
int3 wrote:
> nit 1: for uniformity, can we use a DenseMap instead of a std::map? I know perf isn't important here but it would be nice to avoid std::map where possible
>
> nit 2: I'm pretty sure we can initialize this via initializer lists rather than a lambda, i.e. something like
>
> ```
> platformMap = {{PlatformKind::iOS, PlatformKind::iOSSimulator}, {PlatformKind::iOS, PlatformKind::iOSSimulator}, ...};
> ```
(actually not done)
Re: `DenseMap`, I couldn't use the DenseMap here because :
```
In file included from /Users/vyng/repo/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/DenseSet.h:16:
/Users/vyng/repo/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h:456:22: error: no member named 'getEmptyKey' in 'llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::MachO::PlatformKind>'
return KeyInfoT::getEmptyKey();
```
Didn't seem like it's worth changing the PlatformKind class ... thoughts?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D101855/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D101855
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list