[PATCH] D100676: [nofree] Attempt to further refine concurrency/capture requirements

[Philip Reames via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

reames added a comment.

In D100676#2724074 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100676#2724074>, @nhaehnle wrote:

> Apologies if this is obvious somehow, but could you please point at those "deref" changes? I think I missed that part of the conversation. My hope would be that it could be treated orthogonally to the nofree/nosync question.

Please see the llvm-dev thread "RFC: Decomposing deref(N) into deref(N) + nofree" for background.  Note that the described nofree semantics in that first email have been since decided not to be correct, but it should give you a feel for the interactions.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D100676/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D100676