[PATCH] D100102: [VPlan] Use incoming VPValue to detect in-loop reductions (NFC).
Ayal Zaks via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Apr 27 06:20:41 PDT 2021
Ayal added a comment.
Reducing the coupling with the cost model by using information directly in VPlan is great. Have a few comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:4282
+ bool IsInLoopReductionPhi = PhiR->getNumOperands() == 2 &&
+ isa<VPReductionRecipe>(PhiR->getOperand(1));
----------------
number of operands must be 2, right?
this may be fragile, if some (cast?) vpinstruction is introduced between the VPReductionRecipe and the header phi it feeds? Since in-loop-reduction phi's require special code-gen handling, perhaps their recipes should be marked as such?
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:4693
+ (State.VF.isScalar()) || (PhiR->getNumOperands() == 2 &&
+ isa<VPReductionRecipe>(PhiR->getOperand(1)));
Type *VecTy =
----------------
ditto
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:9036
// and the live-out instruction of each reduction, at the end of the latch.
if (CM.foldTailByMasking() && !Legal->getReductionVars().empty()) {
Builder.setInsertPoint(VPBB);
----------------
Perhaps RecipeBuilder should allow checking if it has any (in-loop) reduction phi's, and iterate over them?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D100102/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D100102
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list