[PATCH] D100353: Support optnone in SCCP

[Florian Hahn via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

fhahn added a comment.

I think this makes sense , but I don't think this behavior is clear for the current definition of `optnone`, which says `.... with the exception of interprocedural optimization passes.`. Do you think it would be worth to spell this out in a clearer way? Should all IPOs ignore `optnone` functions?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D100353/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D100353