[PATCH] D100125: Fixed bug issue #16122

[Florian Hahn via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

fhahn added a comment.

Thanks for the patch! But do we do that for the other instruction syntax blocks as well? AFAICT the syntax blocks are not valid IR (due to the `<>` blocks) and `.. code-block:: llvm` is only used for examples with valid IR?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D100125/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D100125