[PATCH] D99305: [docs] Document our norms around reverts

[Eric Christopher via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

echristo added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst:330
+* In general, if the author themselves would revert the change per these
+  guidelines, we encourage other contributors to do so as a favor to the
+  author.  This is one of the major cases where our norms differ from others;
----------------
reames wrote:
> echristo wrote:
> > I think wording wise we can just remove the "... as a favor to the author." here and reword a little below...
> I left this one as is.  I took all your other edits, but taking this out seems to loose an important point to me.  
I followed up offline here with an article that would help illustrate my point, but for me not having the "I'm doing you a favor" is important. It's not a favor, it's just how we work. There's no obligation or reciprocity expected which the text gives the impression of.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D99305/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D99305