[PATCH] D98936: [RISCV] DAG nodes and pseudo instructions for CSR access

[Alex Bradbury via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

asb added a comment.

In D98936#2642039 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98936#2642039>, @jrtc27 wrote:

> Are there ever any cases where you _wouldn't_ want a CSR-specific pseudo in order to have control over the scheduling of it specifically? This feels a bit like a middle-ground that's the worst of both worlds to me.

Hi @jrtc27 - could you please elaborate a little on the concern that the approach in this path might be the worst of both worlds? I'm not sure I fully follow. Thanks.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D98936/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D98936