[PATCH] D99305: [docs] Document our norms around reverts

[Philip Reames via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

reames added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst:335
+  problematic patch will be reverted and we can return to it at our next
+  opportunity enables this.
+* The other case for a third-party revert is for serious norm violations.
----------------
aprantl wrote:
> Perhaps add: `As a courtesy please notify the author of the patch that you reverted it for them, either by commenting on the review or via email.`
I'd already had a sentence on this above.  I expanded and made it a top level bullet point, does that address your concern?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D99305/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D99305