[PATCH] D99305: [docs] Document our norms around reverts

[Hubert Tong via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst:323
+* If you are asked to revert by another contributor, please revert and discuss
+  the merits of the request offline (unless doing so would further destabilize
+  tip of tree).
----------------
reames wrote:
> hubert.reinterpretcast wrote:
> > This point along with the "if the author themselves would revert" below means that unilateral reverts without discussion is being encouraged here. I'm not in favour of action without discussion.
> This is our long standing practice.  
Sure, but probably for specific reasons and not for all. Otherwise, there wouldn't be "requests" to revert at all (except from people with no commit access).


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D99305/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D99305