[PATCH] D99305: [docs] Document our norms around reverts

[Mehdi AMINI via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

mehdi_amini added a comment.

Thanks! This looks like a great addition to the doc!

Note that we had a paragraph on revert here as well: https://llvm.org/docs/CodeReview.html#can-code-be-reviewed-after-it-is-committed ; I don't think anything is contradictory here, but I wonder if we need to consolidate or cross-reference in some way?



================
Comment at: llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst:326
+  author.  This is one of the major cases where our norms differ from others;
+  we generally consider reverting someones change to be a favor to them.  We
+  don't expect contributors to be always available, and the assurance that a
----------------



Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D99305/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D99305