[PATCH] D93963: [GlobalISel][AMDGPU] Lower G_UMULO/G_SMULO
Jay Foad via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Mar 19 06:17:54 PDT 2021
foad accepted this revision.
foad added a comment.
I think this looks good, just some nits inline. If there are any further improvements they can be done as follow ups.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerHelper.cpp:1868
+ // the larger type itself overflowed.
+ if (WideTy.getScalarSizeInBits() < 2 * SrcBitWidth)
+ MIRBuilder.buildOr(OriginalOverflow, Mulo->getOperand(1), Overflow);
----------------
Needs a comment that the multiply can't possible overflow if the wide type is >= 2 * original width.
It's a shame that you have to duplicate this check from line 1845. Maybe @arsenm knows a cleaner way to write this.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerHelper.cpp:3671
+LegalizerHelper::LegalizeResult
+LegalizerHelper::fewerElementsVectorMulo(MachineInstr &MI, unsigned TypeIdx,
+ LLT NarrowTy) {
----------------
Personally I would be tempted to generalize LegalizerHelper::fewerElementsVectorMultiEltType into a generic function that can handle any operation that works on vector elements independently. But that does not have to be part of this patch.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerHelper.cpp:1854-1855
+ } else {
+ // Unsigned overflow occurred if the high part is non-zero
+ auto ZExtResult = MIRBuilder.buildZExtInReg(WideTy, Mul, SrcBitWidth);
+ Overflow =
----------------
pdhaliwal wrote:
> arsenm wrote:
> > I don't think the unsigned case is right. The DAG version inserts a shift here, not a mask
> I have changed it use shift instead of masking. Just curious, why was previous logic wrong? I thought zero'ing the upper bits of multiplication result and then comparing it with latter should provide the correct result.
I'm pretty sure the previous logic was fine too, it's just a different way of checking the upper part is zero.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93963/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93963
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list