[PATCH] D97969: [SelectionDAG] Assert that operands to SelectionDAG::getNode are not DELETED_NODE to catch issues like PR49393 earlier.

Roman Lebedev via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Mar 4 22:27:10 PST 2021


lebedev.ri added a comment.

In D97969#2604423 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97969#2604423>, @craig.topper wrote:

> In D97969#2604352 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97969#2604352>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
>
>> Won't be `SDValue::Node` deallocated by then, or worse, potentially reallocated?
>> I guess that is still fine because it would trip ASAN?
>
> When an SDNode is deallocated it gets remembered in a free list in the RecylingAllocator. The opcode field had __asan_unpoison_memory_region called on it. See SelectionDAG::DeallocateNode

SGTM


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D97969/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D97969



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list