[PATCH] D97046: [lit] Generalize `early_tests`

[David Zarzycki via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

davezarzycki added a comment.

In D97046#2603037 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97046#2603037>, @lebedev.ri wrote:

> Was there an RFC pitch for `early_tests` on llvm-dev?
> If not, i feel like it might be best to backout that change, and restart the process..

I tried to select a lot of people as reviewers for the original `early_tests` change proposal and unless I missed something, the original `early_tests` seemed generally well received/understood. There was not an RFC on llvm-dev. We can certainly do as you want, but what do you hope to gain by reverting and widening the discussion to all of llvm-dev? Is there something that you think the reviewers here are missing?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D97046/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D97046