[PATCH] D96109: Refactor implementation of -funique-internal-linkage-names.
David Blaikie via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 19 12:32:29 PST 2021
dblaikie added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/Mangle.cpp:119-124
+ // C functions with internal linkage have to be mangled with option
+ // -funique-internal-linkage-names.
+ if (!getASTContext().getLangOpts().CPlusPlus &&
+ isUniqueInternalLinkageDecl(D))
+ return true;
+
----------------
Strikes me as strange to test the language mode here (presumably this logic would apply equally to C++ code, right? If at most it'd be a no-op because things are already mangled)
But, for instance - what about functions with extern "C" linkage in a C++ file?
================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp:205
+ // that this symbol is of internal linkage type.
+ ModuleNameHash = (Twine(".__uniq.")
+ + Twine(IntHash.toString(10, false))).str();
----------------
Does this need the double underscore? I thought other suffixes here generally don't have that feature?
================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp:206
+ ModuleNameHash = (Twine(".__uniq.")
+ + Twine(IntHash.toString(10, false))).str();
+ }
----------------
Might be worth a parameter name comment explaining what the 'false' parameter means? (I guess the 10 means the numeric base to use)
================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp:1179-1182
+ ((isa<FunctionDecl>(D) &&
+ CGM.getFunctionLinkage(GD) == llvm::GlobalValue::InternalLinkage) ||
+ (isa<VarDecl>(D) && CGM.getContext().GetGVALinkageForVariable(
+ cast<VarDecl>(D)) == GVA_Internal)))
----------------
The variety of things being tested here seems non-trivial, and I've no idea how to validate it's correct. Any chance this is existing logic that could be reused from somewhere else/refactored into a common function to call from some existing use case and this new one? (similar thougts on ItaniumDemangle.cpp:isInternalLinkageDecl)
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96109/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96109
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list