[PATCH] D94308: [MachineSink] SinkIntoLoop: analyse stores and aliases in between

[Sam Parker via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

samparker added a comment.

The X86 test is indeed large! Considering that it's just an unrolled loop with the same sequence repeated MANY times, could you not just delete 3/4 of the loop and update the indvar accordingly?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D94308/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D94308