[PATCH] D96662: [lit] Add --skip (inverse of --filter)

[James Henderson via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

jhenderson added a comment.

This definitely seems like something we could use. I haven't looked at the implementation yet, but just thinking about the feature - would it be better to have a flag that marks the test as XFAIL instead? This would mean that once the issue is fixed, the continued use of the switch would cause an XPASS, indicating the switch could be dropped. What do you think?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D96662/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D96662