[PATCH] D95851: [MC][ELF] Support for zero flag section groups

[Petr Hosek via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

phosek added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/include/llvm/MC/MCContext.h:490
                                 unsigned Flags, unsigned EntrySize,
-                                const Twine &Group) {
-      return getELFSection(Section, Type, Flags, EntrySize, Group,
+                                const Twine &Group, bool IsComdat = true) {
+      return getELFSection(Section, Type, Flags, EntrySize, Group, IsComdat,
----------------
MaskRay wrote:
> phosek wrote:
> > MaskRay wrote:
> > > `Group == ""` means a non-SHF_GROUP section. `IsComdat = true` can be misleading for such use cases.
> > > 
> > > We should pick a variable which defaults to false here.
> > > 
> > > NoDeduplicates is a PE-COFF specific name, and we should stick with ELF naming here. So a concise name indicating zero section group flags should be used.
> > I used `IsComdat = true` because I was worried that updating every existing call site is going to be too much effort, but turned it wasn't so bad so I removed the default argument.
> > 
> > I think that having `/*IsComdat=*/true` or `/*IsComdat=*/false` explicitly in the code is actually nice because it's clear which type of group we're requesting.
> > 
> > Let me know what you think.
> If you flip the default to `/*IsComdat=*/false`, it looks good to me.
> 
> That means a generic section has `Group=="" && !IsComdat`.
> A comdat section needs `Group!="" && IsComdat`.
This is done in the latest revision.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D95851/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D95851